Friday, October 31, 2008
MediaScout: What would American elections be without allegations of electoral fraud? ... The potential for voting irregularities is frightening: electronic voting machines in West Virginia, Missouri, Nevada, Georgia and Colorado "flipping" votes; accusations of illegal voter-roll purges in Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Ohio, Nevada and Michigan; Ohio, Florida and Wisconsin residents rendered ineligible to vote due to state database inconsistencies; official-looking pamphlets in Virginia instructing Democrats to vote the day after the election; Alabama residents incorrectly listed as felons, who are not allowed to vote; out-of-state students running into voting problems; Republican threats to challenge the eligibility of voters who lost their homes in the mortgage meltdown...
Hell to Pay
Elliot Cohen: Sen. John McCain's ideological ties to the Bush-Cheney administration have mostly passed beneath the radar of the mainstream media, but if McCain loses the presidential race to Barack Obama, his neoconservative legacy could erupt into the open with a force that should not be underestimated... This is a power-craving administration that will do what it can to retain power... Much will depend on the resolve of the American people and their collective commitment to democracy and the rule of law. We must stand firm against fear mongering, propagandizing, bogus legal challenges, attempts to declare the election invalid by fiat, and other tactics aimed at interrupting the constitutional transfer of power.
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Asia-Pacific Journal: The United States and NATO can't be driven from Afghanistan militarily. Nor, however, can the Taliban be crushed in the foreseeable future... The US is going to be in Afghanistan for years to come. The only thing that's going to change is the objectives...
America's Afghanistan policy is falling into the hands of the realists, whose highest priority is maintaining a tractable and viable client in Kabul, keeping Afghanistan securely inside the US sphere of interest, holding onto a key chess piece in Central Asia's "great game" of energy resources and pipeline infrastructure, and offering the Pentagon another basing option to bedevil Russia and Iran.
Despite the absurdity of a multi-year, multi-billion dollar entanglement in Central Asia that will do little more than advance unilateral US security objectives, America's allies...will probably heed an American call for a redoubled effort...
Inside Pakistan, enthusiasm for US aims and tactics in the "war on terror" is conspicuously lacking. Support for Pakistani casualties on behalf of the stabilization of the US-backed regime in Kabul is virtually non-existent...
The US may be faced with the ironic choice of eliminating two South Asian democracies in the name of a continued struggle to bring freedom to the region. If the objective turns out to be merely to gain the advantage in a negotiated settlement with the Taliban forces we swore to destroy after 9/11, the irony will be deep -- and, to many, bitter.
Image in original.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
The End of International Law?
Robert Dreyfuss: A parallel new Bush doctrine is emerging, in the last days of the soon-to-be ancien regime, and it needs to be strangled in its crib. Like the original Bush doctrine -- which called for preventive military action against emerging threats -- this one also casts international law aside by insisting that the United States has an inherent right to cross international borders in "hot pursuit" of anyone it doesn't like.
Matt Reiner/Maya Schenwar: Regardless of the intent of the raid, Falk called the US action "a serious violation of international law," which allows for the use of violence only in self-defense. Yet [he] does not predict that any enforcement action will be taken, because international laws regulating the use of military force have been so undermined by the US and other nations in recent years. Falk called the raid "the latest display of Washington's disregard for the restraints of international law on the use of force."
Thom Shanker: On Monday, senior officials justified a weekend attack against a suspected Iraqi insurgent leader in Syria by saying the administration was operating under an expansive new definition of self-defense. The policy provided a rationale for conventional strikes on militant targets in a sovereign nation without its consent -- if that nation were unable or unwilling to halt the threat on its own.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Andrew J. Bacevich:
The Age of Triumphalism is over
When Bush entered office in 2001, America's status as sole superpower was self-evident and seemingly irrefutable. As the indispensable nation, the United States presided over a unipolar order. The emery board of globalization was sanding away the world's rough edges and gradually remaking it in America's own image. Commentators vied to find the appropriate historical analogy. The consensus: America was the new Rome, only more so... The central theme of the 2008 presidential election is change... In a real sense, however, change has already occurred. Even before the people have voted, they have spoken. The Age of Triumphalism has ended. The Age of Salvaging What's Left is upon us.
The question I ask myself is what will protect our country from collapsing under the burden of this enormous guilt of having systematically wrecked and destroyed another nation with such impunity? What will protect us from the awareness of being complicit in such unlawful and willful destruction? As the truth becomes impossible to ignore, are we to be transformed from a nation of sleepwalkers into a nation of insomniacs?... We much each ask ourselves, this week before the election, what, precisely, we will be willing to do to bring about the change necessary to end all the illegalities carried out in our name. For this question shall, of course, persist long after November 4.
The old assumptions and paradigms about capitalism and free markets are dead... This collapse is hard for us to fathom. We are still in shock and denial. We cling to old structures of meaning and outdated words... We have yet to realize that all our political science and economic textbooks have become junk... The flagrant corruption of our political system will become clearer as our initial shock wears off. The new America will be about the basics -- jobs, food, health care and a place to live...
We will discard the old vocabulary and learn to speak in the fiery language of populism... The populist conflict will be a battle between a frightened and dispossessed majority and the corporations and elites who seek to ruthlessly cling to power and wealth... The elite will probably be forced to make an uncomfortable alliance with right-wing populists if they want to survive... We have begun a socialist experiment... The question is not whether we will build state socialism. That process has already begun. The only question left is whether this will be right-wing or left-wing socialism.
Monday, October 27, 2008
Syria on Monday vehemently protested over a US attack on a border village that left eight civilians dead on Sunday, with the official press branding it a "war crime." Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora also condemned the US attack as "unacceptable" violation of Syrian sovereignty. Thabet Salem, a veteran Syrian political analyst, told Gulf News it was "nothing but part of John McCain's election campaign... They (the Republicans) want to show the world that things remain complicated in the Middle East and threats are still there, to justify continuation of the 'war on terror.' This gives strong long-term support to the McCain presidency."
Juan Cole: Scott McClellan has already told us that the Bushies are in campaign mode 24/7. I'd say that every single thing they are doing, whether raiding Pakistan or raiding Syria, is intended in some way to help the Republican Party in the election, in addition to whatever local military goal the action had.
Image: Nico Pitney/Huffington Post; 4000 dead make up Bush/McCain faces.
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Only peace protects freedoms
RWB/RSF: It is not economic prosperity but peace that guarantees press freedom. That is the main lesson to be drawn from the world press freedom index that Reporters Without Borders compiles every year... Two aspects stand out in the index, which covers the 12 months to 1 September 2008. One is Europe's preeminence. Aside from New Zealand and Canada, the first 20 positions are held by European countries. The other is the very respectable ranking achieved by certain Central American and Caribbean countries. Jamaica and Costa Rica are in 21st and 22nd positions, rubbing shoulders with Hungar7 (23rd). Just a few positions below them are Surinam (26th) and Trinidad and Tobago (27th). These small Caribbean countries have done much better than France (35th), which has fallen again this year, this time by four places, and Spain (36th)...
The economic disparities among the top 20 are immense. Iceland's per capita GDP is 10 times Jamaica's. What they have in common is a parliamentary democratic system, and not being involved in any war. This is not the case with the United States (36th domestically and 119th outside its own territory) and Israel (46th domestically and 149th outside its own territory)... The other disease that eats away at democracies and makes them lose ground in the ranking is corruption. The bad example of Bulgaria (59th), still last in Europe, serves as a reminder that universal suffrage, media pluralism and some constitutional guarantees are not enough to ensure effective press freedom. The climate must also favour the flow of information and expression of opinions.
Rankings are here.
Friday, October 24, 2008
Pollsters: Conservative attack ads hurt voter turnout and democracy
Douglas Todd, in the Vancouver Sun: The attack ads the Conservative Party of Canada launched during this fall's election campaign not only convinced some declared Liberals not to vote for their party, even more Canadians turned off entirely from voting. Officials from Angus Reid Strategies revealed polling results...
Discussing the ethical implications of negative political advertising, Grenville argued his company's poll shows this year's hard-hitting Conservative ads were part of a disturbing trend that is "poisoning the well" of Canadian politics. "Attack ads can often work in the short term. They can give you a short boost. But they reduce the number of people who want to vote. They reduce participation in the democratic process. They poison the system." ...
The Conservative Party of Canada benefited from a low voter turnout on October 14, the pollsters said... Many supporters of Canada's centre-left parties tend to be more idealistic than Conservatives. Idealists, people who dream of a better world, are prone to drop out of the electoral process if they believe that it has become corrupt or unethical... The most common words those surveyed associated with the TV ads were "disgust," "lies," "unethical" and "unCanadian." ...
Maintaining that almost two decades of vicious political attack ads in the U.S. have made a "farce" of democracy and voter turnout south of the border, Grenville said he hopes Canadians find a way to counteract negative campaigning... "It's up to the people of Canada to say they're sick of this... to say they're sick of being misled and lied to and having politics driven down into the mud."... The Conservatives are unlikely to take a less nasty approach in their advertising when the Liberals elect their next national party leader. "They're probably preparing their attack ads right now."
Thursday, October 23, 2008
... For me the most moving moment came when the family in front of me, comprising probably 4 generations of voters (including an 18 year old girl voting for her first time and a 90-something hunched-over grandmother), got their turn to vote. When the old woman left the voting booth she made it about halfway to the door before collapsing in a nearby chair, where she began weeping uncontrollably. When we rushed over to help we realized that she wasn't in trouble at all but she had not truly believed, until she left the booth, that she would ever live long enough to cast a vote for an African-American for president.
... This vote is 400 years in the making. Pollsters don't seem to take that into account. My 82-year old mother had to be rushed to the hospital last Sunday -- congestive heart failure. One of the first things she asked when the oxygen mask was removed was "Will someone please get me an absentee ballot. I don't want to miss this election." ... This is not only a vote for a candidate; it is a vote for America, the America we heard about from our parents and their parents, across the generations. Freedom and Liberty sound so trite these days, but I remember those words spoken by my Dad on his way to the March on Washington.
From The Guardian, 17 October 2008: "Foreign poll favours Democrat but shows hostility to US."
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Image: Magdalena Abakanowicz, Red Abakan, 1969, sisal and mixed media.
WACK! Art and the Feminist Revolution
Vancouver Art Gallery, through 11 January 2009
Curator: Connie Butler
Few social movements more profoundly marked the end of the last century than feminism. In the space of a generation, feminism transformed social relations, personal identities, and institutional structures. While many of feminism's victories were hard-won and, indeed, remain contested, it is difficult to overstate the movement's impact. The feminist revolution in art was no less radical and transformative than the social movement from which it drew strength. The very terms of current artistic practice are made possible in numerous respects by the groundbreaking works produced by feminist artists in the 1960s and 70s. However, while the social impact of the feminist movement is broadly recognized, the extraordinary contributions of feminism in art are considerably less understood and appreciated...
"WACK!" offers the first international survey of a remarkable body of work that emerged from the dynamic relationship between art and feminism in and around the 1970s and includes 119 artists representing twenty-one different countries. -- Jeremy Strick, Director VAG
A salute to my mother. She would have been 93 today.
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
In the bloodless wars of politics, the wounds are to pride and place. In such activity, men easily exaggerate their relevance to it. More than that, once caught up in it, the significance of politics becomes disproportionate to their lives. To many, I suspect, their importance to themselves, as to others, lies in their being politicians. One would wish it to be the other way round -- that their importance as politicians lies in men being themselves, true to their best impulse and finest ideals, less concerned with the victory of a party as they are more concerned with the survival of their own personality and nature. -- Dalton Camp, Gentlemen, Players and Politicians (1970), #52 in The LRC 100: Canada's Most Important Books.
Monday, October 20, 2008
"It comes down to values," Obama continued. "In America, do we simply value wealth -- or do we value the work that creates it? For eight years we've seen what happens when we put the extremely wealthy and well-connected ahead of working people."
Paul Woodward: Karl couldn't have put it better, yet for so many Americans who've fallen down the rabbit hole of the myth of free enterprise, the freedom of wealth creation has been abstracted from the context within which it occurs. Work is turned into a gift for those who most desperately need it, bestowed by those who claim the largest portion of its rewards. But that isn't really the work we believe in.
The GOP could learn a thing or two from the South Africans and the Israelis: If you believe in and want to sustain a divided society, you should only cling to such a position for as long as you can deprive your opponents of political rights... As so often happens, once the dominant power loses its dominance, it clings to the tactics of domination -- even when they have become self-defeating.
Image: Linda Davidson/The Washington Post.
Sunday, October 19, 2008
Alice Munro is among the major writers of English fiction in our time. She's been accorded armfuls of super-superlatives by critics in both North America and Britain, she's won many awards, and she has a devoted international readership. Among writers, her name is spoken in hushed tones. She's the kind of writer about whom it is often said -- no matter how well known she becomes -- that she ought to be better known...
Through Munro's fiction, Sowesto's Huron County has joined Faulkner's Yoknapatawpha County as a slice of land made legendary by the excellence of the writer who has celebrated it, though in both cases 'celebrated' is not quite the right word. 'Anatomised' might be closer to what goes on in the work of Munro, though even that term is too clinical. What should we call the combination of obsessive scrutiny, archaeological unearthing, precise and detailed recollection, the wallowing in the seamier and meaner and more vengeful undersides of human nature, the telling of erotic secrets, the nostalgia for vanished miseries, and rejoicing in the fullness and variety of life, stirred all together? ...
Given a choice between being a person who does good works but has inauthentic feelings and is numb at heart and being one who behaves badly but is true to what she really feels and is thus alive to herself, a Munro woman is likely to choose the latter; or, if she chooses the former, she will then comment on her own slipperiness, guile, wiliness, slyness and perversity. Honesty, in Munro's work, is not the best policy: it is not a policy at all, but an essential element, like air. The characters must get hold of at least some of it, by fair means or foul, or -- they feel
-- they will go under.
Image by Jim Bodeen: Kits Beach, Vancouver; across the street from Munro's downstairs rooms, and close to mine. See "Alice Munro's Vancouver."
Saturday, October 18, 2008
Thomas Walkom: The great question that remains is what the U.S. will do. It's never been the pure private-enterprise nation that it claims to be. Historically, government has played a key role in American economic development and continues to do so, usually under the guise of military spending.
But more than any other nation, America cleaves to the ideology of free markets... a deep-seated belief in market capitalism that is central to the American world view.
Logically, as a democratic nation, the U.S. should favour social capitalism over its more authoritarian counterpart. But as the presidency of George W. Bush has demonstrated, there is an anti-democratic, anti-civil libertarian strain in American thinking that clever politicians can easily exploit.
Faced with a choice between suppressing markets to encourage freedom or suppressing freedom to encourage markets, what would Americans do? Would they really follow the road of China rather than, say, Sweden?
It's hard to imagine. But then it was hard to imagine the nation that produced the formidable U.S. Constitution and its Bill of Rights rallying behind Bush when he authorized torture, illegal war and the obscene prison camp at Guantanamo Bay.
Friday, October 17, 2008
William Pfaff: The nuclear physicist Leo Szilard once remarked that the fall of the Soviet system would eventually lead to the fall of the American system. In a two-element structure, the interrelationship and interdependence are such that the one cannot survive without the other... Georgi Arbatov, former head of the USA and Canada Institute of the Soviet Union, said to an American interlocutor: We are about to do something truly terrible to you. We are going to deprive you of your enemy.
Without the enemy, the machinery of power begins to race, with nothing to resist it; megalomania sets in. The end of the Cold War coincided with the beginning in the United States of globalized finance. It operated with ever more daring gambles in which the constraints and tension of the Cold War were replaced by the psychology of greed and excess...
Less apparent to most people, but just as real, are the signs of an impending crash of an American military system... Since the end of the Cold War, Pentagon dysfunction has metastasized uncontrollably... The trend line of Pentagon procurement has been toward lower numbers and higher technology, weapons systems "that have been ever more baroque, ever more costly, taking longer to build, and fielded in ever dwindling quantities."
There could not be a better description of a bureaucracy in decadence, just as the same phrase must be applied to a financial system for multiplying the apparent value of fundamentally worthless securities... I think that what Leo Szilard was saying is that a system cut free from the opposition that kept it honest passes into hubris, otherwise known as irrational exuberance, and after hubris comes the fall.
Thursday, October 16, 2008
John R. MacArthur: America remains the land of infinite redemption where any crook can suddenly go straight. In part, it stems from our turbo-charged ethos of capitalism. America has always been the land of get-rich-quick and damn the consequences. We are a nation of fantasists, and things have to get really bad before a politician has the right to trade in hard truth. So far, I don't think they've gotten bad enough.
(The Providence Journal, 15 October 2008)
Sarah Pogell: In Simulacra and Simulation (1981), French philosopher Jean Baudrillard singled out American theme parks as exemplary "simulacra" -- shallow imitations of the real world that that have no connection to the history they represent. The popularity of theme parks... reflects Americans' marked preference for the sanitized, the artificial, and the unreal... Americans prefer nostalgia to knowledge of the real past. They pick and choose which parts of history to remember... Historical landmarks and theme parks are nostalgic bait-and-switches that ignore or even deny the violence and pain of actual history. ("The Wonderful World of Saunders," Maisonneuve Fall 2008)
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Truth is that thing which makes what we want to happen happen. Truth is that thing which, when told, makes those on our team look good... So when a rumor makes you doubt us, us up here, it is therefore not true, since we have already defined truth as that thing that helps us win. -- George Saunders, Pastoralia
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Godwin's Law applies to inappropriate, inordinate, or hyperbolic comparisons with Hitler or Nazis or their acts, tactics, and strategies. But Godwin's Law itself can be abused, as a means of distracting, diverting, ridiculing, or silencing an opponent, especially when the comparisons made are actually valid.
The following list may be useful in analysis of current government and politics in Canada and the US:
1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism
2. Disdain for human rights
3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause
4. Supremacy of the military; avid militarism
5. Elevation of masculinity
6. Controlled mass media
7. Obsession with national security
8. Religion and ruling elite tied together
9. Corporate power protected
10. Labor power suppressed or eliminated
11. Disdain for intellectuals and the arts
12. Obsession with crime and punishment
13. Cronyism and corruption
14. Fraudulent elections
Compiled by Lawrence W. Britt after a study of Adolph Hitler's Nazi Germany, Benito Mussolini's Italy, Francisco Franco's Spain, Antonio de Oliveira Salazar's Portugal, George Papadopoulos' Greece, Augusto Pinochet's Chile, and Mohamed Suharto's Indonesia.
Monday, October 13, 2008
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Feared but not much loved.
Harper shares several traits with Bush. He can be excessively partisan: you're either with him or against him. If you don't back his disastrous and costly Afghan policy, you are unpatriotic, unfaithful to Canadian troops and an apologist for the Taliban. He is secretive and authoritarian. He does not tolerate dissent...
Harper has also been accused of saying one thing and doing another... Harper and most conservative leaders talk of fiscal responsibility but end up emptying the treasury...
As is well known, he muzzled his caucus, including ministers, and the federal bureaucrats, including our diplomats. We also know what Harper did to the heads of three independent commissions who challenged him... "In each of these dust-ups," wrote professor Lorne Sossin of the faculty of law at the U of T, the Harper government looked "reckless, petty, arrogant, incompetent, paranoid, sinister and/or just plain vindictive."
Saturday, October 11, 2008
Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus:
What I excoriate is that today there is only one incentive for doing business, and that is the maximization of profits. But the incentive of doing social good must be included...
Earning as much money as possible can be a means to an end, not an end in itself. One has to invest money in something meaningful -- and I would make a case for it being something that improves the quality of life for all people... Were there more socially minded companies, people would have more opportunities to shape their own lives. The markets would be more balanced than they are today...
Today's capitalism has degenerated into a casino. The financial markets are propelled by greed. Speculation has reached catastrophic proportions. These are all things that have to end...
In the US, the financial system has completely split off from the real economy. Castles were built in the sky, and suddenly people realized that these castles don't exist at all. That was the point at which the financial system collapsed... It has become clear that Adam Smith's "invisible hand," which supposedly solves all the market's problems, doesn't exist.
Friday, October 10, 2008
In a system of production, where the entire continuity of the reproduction process rests upon credit, a crisis must obviously occur -- a tremendous rush for means of payment -- when credit suddenly ceases and only cash payments have validity. At first glance, therefore, the whole crisis seems to be merely a credit and money crisis. And in fact it is only a question of the convertability of bills of exchange into money.
But the majority of these bills represent actual sales and purchases, whose extension far beyond the needs of society is, after all, the basis of the whole crisis. At the same time, an enormous quantity of these bills of exchange represents plain swindle, which now reaches the light of day and collapses; furthermore, unsuccessful speculation with the capital of other people; finally, commodity-capital which has depreciated or is completely unsaleable, or returns that can never more be realised again.
The entire artificial system of forced expansion of the reproduction process cannot, of course, be remedied by having some bank give to all the swindlers the deficient capital by means of its paper and having it buy up all the depreciated commodities at their old nominal values.
Incidentally, everything here appears distorted, since in this paper world, the real price and its real basis appear nowhere, but only bullion, metal coin, notes, bills of exchange, securities. Particularly in centres where the entire money business of the country is concentrated does this distortion become apparent; the entire process becomes incomprehensible; it is less so in centres of production.
-- Karl Marx, Capital (Vol III, Part V, Chapter 30, Section 1).
Thursday, October 9, 2008
"The psychopath is unfamiliar with the primary facts or data of what might be called personal values and is altogether incapable of understanding such matters. It is impossible for him to take even a slight interest in the tragedy or joy or the striving of humanity as presented in serious literature or art. He is also indifferent to all these matters in life itself... He is furthermore, lacking in the ability to see that others are moved.
"It is as though he were colour-blind, despite his sharp intelligence, to this aspect of human existence... He can repeat the words and say glibly that he understands, and there is no way for him to realize that he does not understand."
-- Hervey Cleckley in The Mask of Sanity, quoted in Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us by Robert D. Hare, professor emeritus UBC.
Hare developed the Psychopathy Checklist (PCL) and Psychopathy Checklist Revised (PCL-L), a method now used worldwide. The Checklist describes the key emotional and interpersonal characteristics of psychopaths: they are glib and superficial, egocentric and grandiose, lack remorse or guilt, lack empathy, are deceitful and manipulative, and have shallow emotions.
"Some researchers have commented that psychopaths 'know the words but not the music,' a statement that accurately captures their cold and empty core. Not only are psychopaths unconcerned about the impact of their own behaviour on others -- or of possible retribution -- they more often than not will blame their victim if they are caught."
-- Paul Babiak and Robert D. Hare, Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work.
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Mike Watkins: Facing accusations he is running a deficit already, Conservative leader Stephen Harper denies the charge: "No. That's absolutely not the case." Yet to date this year the Harper government has racked up more than $20 billion in new public debt, an amount far larger than during any similar time or period during the last 8 years. What is Stephen Harper hiding?
Read more (with graphs and spreadsheet) here.
Letter to the editor, The Toronto Star:
I love my country just like anybody else. But when I hear of things our troops have done in Afghanistan, I have to ask, "What kind of legacy do we wish to leave behind?"
Some examples: we respond to hostile fire by indiscriminate bombing and shelling of villages, killing innocent men, women and children; we fire white phosphorus shells (a chemical weapon outlawed by the Geneva Conventions due to the horrific way it burns human beings) into vineyards where it was known Afghan insurgents were deployed; we hand over prisoners of war to Afghan authorities, who torture them; and we shoot and kill a 2-year-old Afghan boy and his 4-year-old sister. Do we want to be remembered for hating, killing and destroying, or caring, healing and helping with reconstruction?
The war in Afghanistan is a lie. How can we inspire the Afghan people to respect liberty, democracy, equality for women, education for children, human rights and respect for life when we are maiming and murdering them and destroying their homes, communities, the economy and their country? If mothers and fathers keep on sending our youth to Afghanistan, then our sons and daughters will keep on fighting and dying and will keep on killing and injuring the sons and daughters of the Afghan people. And mothers and fathers of Canada and Afghanistan will keep on crying.
Soldiers are trained to operate military equipment and vehicles. A weapon is put in one hand and ammunition in the other, and we are taught the fine art of killing our fellow human beings. If we wish to end this cycle of death, injury, destruction, hate, sorry and despair, then we must stop war. So, when in future, our maimed soldiers walk down the street and our children ask, "Why?" we will say "Afghanistan" and mean a place where Canada turned against war and for peace, and not an obscene memory.
My fellow citizens, help me and soldiers like me end the war. Let's hear your voices. Let's do something we can all be proud of. If we achieve peace in Afghanistan, then the deaths of 97 of my "comrades in arms" and of unreported thousands of innocent Afghans will not have been in vain. Support the troops. Support peace. Bring our troops home now.
-- Corporal Paul Demetrick, Canadian Army (Reserve), Penticton, B.C.
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
in The Globe and Mail (excerpts):
Why do I feel so strongly about this? It's not just the arts... His arts position is symptomatic of his deeply worrying, out-of-touch, out-of-date boy-in-a bubble thinking towards everything. Like George W. Bush, he sticks to his ideology and ignores the evidence... As Mr. Duceppe paraphrased in the French-language debate, he seems to think artists are "spoiled children."
Then what are voters? They, too, are children: a view Mr. Harper learned well during his University-of-Calgary-Reform-Party-firewall-around-Alberta-think-tanking days... People should be managed from behind the scenes by a few superior intelligences such as his; they must be told sugar-coated lies; and you should decide everything really important about their lives without consulting them...
Mr. Harper hugs his True Believer hardcore neo-con faith -- deregulate and do nothing, aside from weaponry and jails -- and he'll stick to it, no matter what he says during this election... During the debates Mr. Harper kept saying, "Canada is not the United States." He forgot to add the word "yet": If he has his way, it soon will be... Mr. Harper got elected by promising to consult, to be transparent, to be accountable, but he's delivered the extreme opposite. He doesn't consult with anybody but himself in the mirror; he has the most secretive government Canada has ever known; and his accountability consists of "If I make a mistake, you're fired."...
Dear fellow Canadians: If you give Harper neo-cons a majority government, you'll lose much that you cherish, you'll gain nothing worth having, and you'll never, never forgive yourselves.
Monday, October 6, 2008
The democratic paradox is that while the ideology of the current Canadian government is one that declaims decentralization, accountability and transparency, that ideology appears to be just a populist fig leaf, designed to hide the authoritarian nature of those in charge...
Canadians -- and the parliamentary press gallery -- are yearning for an appropriate metaphor to describe what has been happening in Harper's Ottawa. How about the covert coup d'etat or the de facto dictatorship?
The 21st century has seen the rise of citizens' movements to take back the night or to take back the neighbourhood... In politics, citizens, members of Parliament, bureaucrats and Cabinet ministers still have the constitutional ability to take back democracy. They just need to exercise their will to do this...
Meanwhile, if we are to be stuck with court government until this demotic Valhalla arrives, Canada might consider asking Harper to emulate the French courts of the Valois and the Bourbons... All major decisions were made by a much larger social microcosm than Harper has in his PMO. And the king and his courtiers prided themselves in being patrons of the arts and good architecture. After all, if one is going to act like a monarch, one should acquire some of the more attractive attributes of monarchy. Image source here.
Sunday, October 5, 2008
The core of any government reflects the personality of the prime minister, because everyone in the system responds to his or her ways of thinking, personality traits, political ambitions and policy preferences...
There is respect for the Prime Minister's intelligence, but fear of his retribution runs deep. Almost no one inside the Conservative Party will speak on the record about him... Mr. Harper remains a mystery. He seldom reveals his inner self, even to his colleagues... He is a buttoned-up, buttoned-down politician who commands respect but little affection. Close to none of his cabinet colleagues, he ignores many, intimidates most, and trusts only a few...
So it's perhaps no surprise that 55 per cent of respondents to a Harris/Decima poll last spring agreed that "there is something about Stephen Harper that I just don't like."...
He speaks regularly to few people outside Ottawa. He is supremely confident in his own political judgment and intellect... He alone (or with an adviser or two) will draft key statements. Until recently he made almost all of the government's announcements himself... "A very revealing phrase he often uses is 'politics is a business.' He sees himself as the chief executive officer of an organization."...
According to a Conservative insider, "the most consistent message the Prime Minister gives" is: "Be more political. Even though you're the government, don't hold water for the government. You're Conservatives. Don't get too comfortable doing what you're doing, because you don't belong here."...
In private, the 6-foot-2 Mr. Harper can be intimidating. "He's a big man. He screams and he's got a filthy mouth," says someone who has seen his temper up close... A senior government official says, "There's a menacing undertone sometimes. He can go very cold and cut ministers to the quick... A senior bureaucrat agrees: "I can't believe sometimes the meanness of his style in Parliament -- or of the government, for that matter." ... "Where do his demons come from?" asks a Conservative lobbyist who knows him well. "I don't know."
Saturday, October 4, 2008
A former adviser recalls surveys early in Mr. Harper's leadership that found five lenses through which Canadians viewed their country: health care, not being American, peacekeeping, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and multiculturalism/ immigration.
"It's not that Harper is per se against any of these; indeed, he has to try to identify his party with some of them such as multiculturalism/ immigration. But he is trying to search for new definitions that would be more akin to a Conservative Canada. The most obvious is defence, and what a more robust defence capability would mean for projecting Canada in the world."
The Canadian Forces are popular; spending more money on them is not necessarily so, according to opinion polls. Mr. Harper knows this, but he believes that the spending is both necessary and politically useful. After all, a Conservative minister notes, "we're the only conservative party in the world that isn't the party of patriotism."
It helps that support for the military is something emotional for Mr. Harper. "He thinks that it's intrinsic in the Canadian experience," a senior minister says. "That's not rhetoric. That is part of his makeup. ... I don't think he wears his religion on his sleeve, but he wears his love of the forces on his sleeve." And he wears the Canadian flag in his lapel. He will end a speech by saying, "God Bless Canada," or, more recently, "God keep our land glorious and free."
Friday, October 3, 2008
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
George Orwell, on how to avoid thinking when you speak:
You can shirk it by simply throwing your mind open and letting the ready-made phrases come crowding in. they will construct your sentences for you -- even think your thoughts for you, to a certain extent -- and at need they will perform the important service of partially concealing your meaning even from yourself. It is at this point that the special connexion between politics and the debasement of language becomes clear...
It does not consist in picking out words for the sake of their meaning and inventing images in order to make the meaning clearer. It consists in gumming together long strips of words which have already been set in order by someone else, and making the results presentable by sheer humbug. The attraction of this, is that it is easy.